The State of America's Direct Support Workforce Crisis 2026

In the face of federal Medicaid cuts, we need your response now more than ever.
Take the 2026 Survey
Connections - 05.27.26

Reducing Medication Errors in I/DD Settings Starts with Better Systems

Share this page
In Partnership with

Medication management in intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DD) settings is complex by nature. Staff often support multiple individuals, each with unique medication regimens that may include behavioral health treatments, frequent changes, and time-sensitive dosing.

In these environments, medication errors are rarely the result of negligence. More often, they stem from complex workflows, inconsistent systems, and the realities of day-to-day care. As providers continue to prioritize quality, safety, and staff support, it is worth examining how medication processes themselves can either reduce or introduce risk.

Why medication errors occur in I/DD settings

Several factors make medication management particularly challenging in I/DD environments:

  • High medication volume: Many individuals are prescribed multiple medications, often administered at different times throughout the day.
  • Polypharmacy and behavioral health needs: These require careful coordination, monitoring, and timing.
  • Staffing variability: Direct support professionals (DSPs) and other staff may have varying levels of clinical training, and turnover can impact consistency.
  • Manual or disconnected systems: Paper medication administration records (MARs) or siloed tools can lead to missed updates, unclear instructions, and communication gaps.

In busy settings, even small breakdowns can result in common issues such as missed doses, incorrect timing, or administering the wrong medication. Addressing these challenges requires more than diligence, it requires systems designed for the complexity of I/DD care.

Four ways providers can reduce medication errors

While every organization is different, providers across the country are finding success by focusing on four key areas:

  1. Simplifying medication administration

Pre-sorted, clearly labeled medication packaging can significantly reduce the burden on staff. When medications are organized by date and time, staff no longer need to manually sort or interpret complex instructions during med pass.

This approach helps reduce missed or duplicate doses and makes it easier for staff to confirm they are administering the right medication at the right time.

  1. Strengthening clinical oversight

Regular medication reviews are critical, particularly for individuals with complex or evolving needs. Ongoing collaboration between pharmacists, prescribers, and care teams can help identify potential drug interactions, duplicate therapies, or opportunities to simplify regimens.

This proactive oversight supports safer, more effective medication management and can reduce the risk of adverse drug events.

  1. Standardizing processes with technology

Technology can play a meaningful role in improving accuracy and consistency. Electronic medication administration records (eMARs), integrated systems, and tools like barcode scanning at the point of administration help reduce reliance on manual processes.

Equally important is ensuring that systems communicate with one another, providing real-time visibility into medication changes and reducing the likelihood of outdated or incomplete information.

  1. Ensuring reliable medication access

Even the best systems can fall short if medications are not available when needed. Coordinated delivery schedules aligned to medication cycles—and the ability to respond quickly to changes—help ensure that staff always have the right medications on hand.

This reduces last-minute disruptions and creates a more predictable, stable environment for both staff and the individuals they support.

The impact on staff and individuals

When medication systems are well-designed and consistently applied, the benefits extend beyond reducing errors.

For staff, streamlined workflows reduce administrative burden and cognitive load. Instead of focusing on sorting medications or double-checking manual processes, they can spend more time engaging with individuals and providing care.

For individuals, improved consistency leads to better medication adherence and more stable outcomes. In I/DD settings, where routine and predictability are especially important, this can have a meaningful impact on quality of life.

A systems-based approach to safer care

Medication safety in I/DD settings is not solely about individual performance—it is about the systems that support that performance.

As providers evaluate their current processes, a key question to consider is whether those systems are designed for the realities of I/DD care. Are they reducing complexity for staff? Are they supporting accuracy and consistency? Are they enabling better outcomes for the individuals served?

By focusing on these questions, organizations can take meaningful steps toward safer, more reliable medication management—and ultimately, higher-quality care.

Gus Pippis is Vice President of Operations at Tarrytown Expocare Pharmacy.